• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0501
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem Embolism (1829)
Event Date 03/29/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was received.The investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
This is being filed to report the difficult to remove the lock and gripper lines, and detachment of the clip.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The clip delivery system (cds) was advanced.Imaging and grasping were difficult due to the patient anatomy.The leaflets were finally grasped and the mr was reduced to mild.The deployment sequence was started.While retracting the lock line, it became tangled.The line was able to be untangled and continued to be retracted.When the line was almost completely removed, it became stuck and could not be retracted.Troubleshooting was performed, with no success.The decision was made to continue with deployment.The gripper line was partially removed when it was noted that the clip had completely detached from both leaflets and remained on the gripper line.The clip then detached from the gripper line and was free floating in the left atrium (la).A second transseptal puncture was made and a new steerable guide catheter (sgc) was advanced in an attempt to snare the clip.The sgc was torqued, trapping the clip against the atrium wall.Another puncture was made and a snare device was used to retrieve the clip.Outside the anatomy, the clip was noted to be tangled with the gripper line.The physician commented that under fluoro, it did not appear that the clip was completely closed on the leaflets even though they thought they had good grasping.The procedure was restarted and a new cds was used.1 clip was implanted, reducing the mr to 1-2.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported complete clip detachment (ccd), failure to adhere or bond, and poor image resolution could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was related to patient/procedural conditions, and the reported inability closing the clip could not be tested for.The reported inability to remove the lock line and complete clip detachment were confirmed.A knot was observed in the lock line.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to this lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents.The investigation determined the reported ccd, failure to adhere or bond and poor image resolution to be due to a combination of patient morphology/pathology and procedural circumstances.A definitive cause for the reported inability to close the clip however, could not be determined.The observed knot on the lock line was due to user technique/procedural conditions as the lock line getting tangled during lock line removal likely created the knot upon untangling it.The inability to remove the lock line/mechanical jam appears to be the result of the observed knot.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the initially filed medwatch, follow up information confirmed the clip remained partially on the gripper line and was not free-floating in the anatomy.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7448163
MDR Text Key106134017
Report Number2024168-2018-02940
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/24/2019
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0501
Device Lot Number80123U291
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/10/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/29/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/20/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/30/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient Weight77
-
-