(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device was received and inspected visually and tested for its functionality.Visually, there are no anomalies found on the device.The complaint cannot be confirmed.All the parts seem intact and in good working condition.The device was mated with an expressew iii needle and tested on a sample rubber strip.The needle was deployed successfully and suture passed through the rubber strip.This procedure was repeated several times successfully to confirm the suture passer performed as intended.We cannot confirm the reported failure of this device at this point.A possible hypothesis for the reported failure would be during the procedure too much tissue was grabbed between the suture passer putting extra load on the needle to pass through it.However other than this possibility, we cannot discern a potential root cause for the reported failure.A device history record (dhr) review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident; therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the paperwork reviewed.Further, a review into the (b)(4) complaints system revealed no other complaints of any type for this lot that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, (b)(4) will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|