Film evaluation summary: the exact cause of the reported stent graft ¿protrusion¿ that occurred immediately after implant could not be determined from the images and event details provided.Ct¿s prior to implant were not available for review and a complete assessment of the patient¿s anatomy could not be performed.Ct¿s post-implant were also not provided.Angiograms returned during implant revealed that the patient had a ~6cm taa located along the inner curvature of the arch, beginning ~15mm caudal to the lsa.A valiant captivia device was brought up and positioned just past the lsa; the delivery system was biased along the outer curvature of the arch and was gradually angulated ~90 deg from proximal to distal end of the stent graft.No device issues were seen prior to deployment.Following what appeared to be a normal deployment, final angiogram showed that the valiant had been deployed just caudal to the lsa (which was patent), the taa had been excluded with no obvious endoleaks observed.The stent graft od at the proximal end near covered stent #1 measured~30mm, the stent graft expanded slightly to 32mm at stent ring #2 within the unsupported taa, and just distal to the taa the stent graft od narrowed to 23mm.The stent graft od at the distal end measured 32mm.No stent graft issues were observed during or post -deployment.The device was patent, with no obvious stent graft kinks or any other issues observed.It is likely that the reported protrusion was actually the stent graft expanding within the unsupported section of the taa, which would be an expected occurrence, and it is possible that this expansion was the reason why ballooning was not performed within this stent graft location.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|