• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. EMERALD; SURGICAL ADJUNCTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. EMERALD; SURGICAL ADJUNCTS Back to Search Results
Model Number EMERALDC30
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/27/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted; give date: n/a (not applicable).The cartridge is not an implantable device.If explanted; give date: n/a (not applicable).The cartridge is not an implantable device; therefore, not explanted.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the customer that when using the cartridge, the doctor noted that the edges were rough.The deformed cartridge tip made insertion into the wound difficult but possible.The lens was implanted.There was no adverse event.No additional information was provided to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device available for evaluation, returned to manufacturer on: 5/18/2018.Device evaluation: the returned cartridge was received in a plastic bag.No visual viscoelastic residue was detected on the returned cartridge.However, a small stain that appears to be salt, probably related to balanced salt solution (bss), was noted.Per the directions for use (dfu), the use of viscoelastic is required.The cartridge is cracked and the tip is deformed.The reported issue was verified; however, based on the returned product it could not be determined that the reported cause of the issue reported occurred during the manufacturing process.Manufacturing record review: manufacturing record review of the production order revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specification.There was no discrepancy found during the review.A search revealed no additional investigations were requested for this production order.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the product.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMERALD
Type of Device
SURGICAL ADJUNCTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
santa ana CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
road 402 north, km 4.2
anasco industrial park, pob 14
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
pamela mcclain
1700 east st. andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478243
MDR Report Key7463079
MDR Text Key106705117
Report Number2648035-2018-00607
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYB
UDI-Device Identifier05050474530027
UDI-Public(01)05050474530027(17)181129(10)CC14015
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K961242
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,07/06/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date11/29/2018
Device Model NumberEMERALDC30
Device Catalogue NumberEMERALDC30
Device Lot NumberCC14015
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/18/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/27/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/25/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/06/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/29/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-