Device is a combination product.Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was not returned for analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications. the investigation conclusion is anticipated procedural complication as the event is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure noted within the directions for use, and/or device labeling.(b)(4).
|
(b)(6) clinical study.It was reported that myocardial infarction (mi) and in-stent restenosis (isr) occurred.In (b)(6) 2017, the patient was referred for cardiac catheterization and index procedure was performed.The target lesion was located in the mid left anterior descending artery (lad) with 85% stenosis and was 16 mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 3.0 mm.The target lesion was treated with direct placement of a 3.00 x 32 mm study stent.Following post dilatation there was 0% residual stenosis and timi 3 flow.On the following day, the patient was discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy.In (b)(6) 2018, the patient's troponin level was found to be elevated.The site has reported an event of mi.On the same day, the patient was hospitalized for further investigation and treatment.Electrocardiogram (ecg) revealed, sinus rhythm, marked st elevation suggesting of acute infract.Low qrs voltage in extremity leads.Per estimated date of confinement, the diagnosis of mi was based on symptoms, biomarker elevation and ecgs changes.Mild diffuse disease proximally, 90% isr of the study stent in mid portion, mild diffuse disease noted distally; 80% ostial stenosis in 1st diagonal.The 90% isr of study stent located at mid lad was treated with predilatation and placement of 3.0 x 26mm non-bsc drug eluting stent.Following post- dilatation there was 0% residual stenosis and timi 3 flow.Five days later, the event was considered resolved and the patient was discharged from the hospital.
|