• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/04/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are: product id 3889 ,lot# unknown, implanted: (b)(6) 2018, explanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead; product id: 3889-28, serial# unknown, product: type lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3889, serial/lot #: unknown; product id: 3889-28, serial/lot #: unknown, (b)(6).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the tined lead was not working and was explanted.It was reported that the patient was in for a battery replacement.Upon the procedure the lead was not working properly and was removed.Another lead was implanted prior and a partial explant was completed.Contributing factors to the reported event were unknown.A proper lead and ins were implanted.It was reported the improper working tined lead and another partial lead were removed.It was reported the issue was resolved at the time of the report.It was further reported that the tined lead that wasn't working properly was removed and replaced with a proper working lead.Another lead was also in the patient and hadn't been removed.The healthcare provider attempted to remove the additional lead and was able to explant most of the lead.No patient symptoms were reported.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.Manufacturer representative reported it was unknown which lead had which issue (one of the interstim tuned leads that was either fully or partially implanted was serial number (b)(4) and the other (b)(4)).It was reported that the lead that was not working properly was tested during the procedure and did not provide stimulation.No further complications reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device received, analysis not yet complete if information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) (b(4) and the 2 leads were completed.It was revealed that the ins passed functional testing, one of the leads was segmented, and one of the lead was stretched in the body.Electrical testing determined that continuity was complete on the lead and there no electrical shorts between circuits.Good impedance and stable outputs were observed on all electrode pairs.It was observed that the #0 connector of one of the leads was crushed and the distal end was not return.Also, it was observed that the markings were on the outer insulation of the one of the leads, which was consistent with markings from the use of a tool.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from a manufacturer representative (rep).It was reported that the cause of the lead not working was unknown.Also, the healthcare professional (hcp) was unable to retrieve the remaining lead and there was no cause for why that remained in the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7490493
MDR Text Key107469388
Report Number3004209178-2018-10211
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/14/2015
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/14/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/04/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/07/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/07/2018
05/14/2018
06/22/2018
07/09/2018
08/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/10/2018
05/15/2018
06/27/2018
07/11/2018
10/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/16/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-