• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC. MAXI MOVE; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC. MAXI MOVE; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Model Number KMCSCXN
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Hematoma (1884)
Event Date 04/10/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).On (b)(6) 2018 arjo has become aware of an event which occurred in (b)(6) residence located in (b)(6) with the involvement of arjo system: maxi move passive floor lift and maa4100-xl passive clip sling.It was reported that during resident transfer from a bed to a wheelchair, during initial phase of the transfer (resident was being raised from the left side of the bed), the right leg sling clip detached from the lift spreader bar.It was reported that resident (male, (b)(6) years old, (b)(6) kg) fell from the sling towards the left side of the bed.As a consequence of the event the resident's left side of head hit the nightstand (located near the bed) and right knee hit the bedframe.One of the staff members absorbed part of residents fall then the second staff lowered him to ground.The resident was transferred to (b)(6) hospital, assessed and returned with pain medication less than 24 hours later.No fractures were identified.The resident sustained a hematoma to right knee and the left side of his head.The blister was applied on the knee.After the event the device was quarantined by the facility and subjected to technical inspection by arjo service technician.The lift inspection showed that one castor was not locking properly, no other malfunction was detected.Please note that castor malfunction did not cause nor contribute to the reported failure.The sling inspection showed that the clip had a very low resistance and the head supports were missing.The sling evaluation confirmed that the sling was manufactured in 2005.Additionally, facility director of care, advised that she had a discussion with both involved in the event care staff regarding the sling attachment process when securing clip slings to the spreader bar.Conclusion of that discussion was an agreement to organize a post-incident training for the customer facility staff.The passive clip sling is a product intended for assisted transfers of residents with limited ability to move.The product's instruction for use (ifu) is provided with each device and describes the methods of use.The ifu provides also pictographic guidance regarding proper clip attachment process.The document guides, step by step, through a proper sling application.It is important to make sure that the clip sling is attached securely before and during the lifting process.According to the ifu for slings ((b)(4)): "it is essential that slings, their attachment cords, their straps and attachment clips are carefully inspected before each and every use.If the sling, cords or straps are frayed or their clips damaged, the sling or attachment cord should be withdrawn from use immediately and replaced." always check that all the sling attachment clips are fully in position before and during the lifting cycle, and in tension as the patient's weight is gradually taken up" additionally ifu warns that "the expected operational life for fabric slings and fabric stretchers is approximately 2 years from date of manufacture.This life expectancy only applies if the slings and stretchers have been cleaned, maintained and inspected in accordance with the "arjo sling information" documents, the "operating and product care instructions" and the "preventive maintenance schedule".Please note that the sling has been used for approximately 13 years.Based on the product knowledge and a simulation, when the labeling is followed and the sling is placed in the correct way and the instructions of using the system are followed, it is very unlikely a patient drop or other adverse event during the transfer of the patient with the sling and lift will occur.A sling clip, once correctly attached and monitored to stay in place as the weight of the person in the sling is gradually taken up, as stated in the labeling, is locked in position with the weight of the patient.It cannot go downward as it is suspended on the clip attachment lug, and it cannot go upward because it is pulled down by the weight of the patient.When reviewing reportable complaints for maxi move registered during last 5 years with similar fault description (clip detachment), we have found a limited number of reportable complaints.Review of similar complaints reported in the past confirmed that this failure is only possible to occur when the labeling was not followed.To conclude, the system - clip sling and lift, was used for patient transfer and in that way contributed to the alleged event.The sling clip did not pass inspection after the event - the clip has low resistance, have missing head supports and have been in use for above 10 years, it means that the system did not meet its performance specification.We report this event to competent authority based on the potential of serious injury if the incident would to re-occurred.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2018 arjo has become aware of an event which occurred in (b)(6) residence located in (b)(6) with the involvement of arjo system: maxi move passive floor lift and (b)(4)-xl passive clip sling.It was reported that during resident transfer from a bed to a wheelchair, during initial phase of the transfer (resident was being raised from the left side of the bed), the right leg sling clip detached from the lift spreader bar.It was reported that resident (male, (b)(6) years old, (b)(6) kg) fell from the sling towards the left side of the bed.As a consequence of the event the resident's left side of head hit the nightstand (located near the bed) and right knee hit the bedframe.One of the staff members absorbed part of residents fall then the second staff lowered him to ground.The resident was transferred to (b)(6) hospital, assessed and returned with pain medication less than 24 hours later.No fractures were identified.The resident sustained a hematoma to right knee and the left side of his head.The blister was applied on the knee.After the event the device was quarantined by the facility and subjected to technical inspection by arjo service technician.The lift inspection showed that one castor was not locking properly, no other malfunction was detected.Please note that castor malfunction did not cause nor contribute to the reported failure.The sling inspection showed that the clip had a very low resistance and the head supports were missing.The sling evaluation confirmed that the sling was manufactured in 2005.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAXI MOVE
Type of Device
LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.
2001 tanguay street
magog,
CA 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.
2001 tanguay street
magog,
CA  
Manufacturer Contact
stolinska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki, 62-05-2
PL   62-052
MDR Report Key7497852
MDR Text Key107697550
Report Number9681684-2018-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FSA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other Caregivers
Device Model NumberKMCSCXN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA05/09/2018
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/13/2018
Device Age7 YR
Event Location Nursing Home
Date Report to Manufacturer05/09/2018
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/13/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/09/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/16/2010
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient Weight94
-
-