(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The customer reported the device was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
This is filed to report the clip movement, single leaflet device attachment (slda), detached clip, difficult to remove gripper line and tissue damage.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat a degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+.The first clip delivery system (cds) was advanced to the mitral valve.Grasping was performed with some difficulties, and during deployment, an attempt was made to floss the gripper line (gl), but it did not move.The gripper lines were twisted.Tension was released on the plus knobs 5 times and then were untangled and flossing was performed.Pulled one line and other line still moving with good grasp and the clip was deployed.During the attempt to remove the gripper line, there was clip movement and stopped pulling on the gripper line.However, the clip had detached from the anterior leaflet and remained attached to the posterior leaflet (slda).The gripper line was removed and the clip came off the posterior leaflet and was still attached to the gripper line.Tension was maintained and the gripper line was secured.The entire system was pulled out to the groin and a snare device was used to explant the clip.At this point, the procedure was aborted.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.All available information was investigated and the reported difficulty grasping appears to be related to the challenging patient morphology/pathology (prolapse flail (p2)).The reported single leaflet device attachment (slda) appears to be related to a combination of challenging patient anatomy/pathology and procedural conditions (tension on the system from trying to floss the gripper line).The reported partial clip movement and complete clip detachment (ccd) appear to be a result of the procedural conditions (maneuvers related to removing the gripper line).The reported difficulty to remove the gripper line was a secondary effect of the physical property issue with gripper line (twisted gripper line).However, a definitive cause for the gripper line issue could not be determined.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing or labeling of the device.
|