• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA) ROTABLATOR ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA) ROTABLATOR ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H802228240020
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problems Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Thrombosis (2100)
Event Date 03/23/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at the time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-04059.It was reported that the patient's blood pressure went down and removal difficulties occurred.The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery.A 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus and a 330cm rotawire were selected for use.During procedure, the physician encountered difficulty in crossing the rotawire.Subsequently, the rotawire was able to cross the lesion and the burr was loaded.However, the patient's blood pressure started to go down; thus, the physician aspirated the vessel and the blood flow was resolved.The burr was again advanced to the patient's body; however, the burr became stuck in the guide catheter around the secondary curve.The physician maneuvered the burr by pushing and pulling a few times and activate the dynaglide mode to facilitate advancement.The burr was advanced but resistance was still encountered and it kept ejecting the guide catheter out.Thus, it was decided to discontinue the procedure.It was noted that the burr was difficult to remove so the rotawire and the burr were removed as a unit.Thrombus was observed twirled around the rotawire upon removal.There were no further patient complications reported and the patient's condition was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.There was a foreign material (fm) on the tip, as part of overall visual revision.Visual and microscopic inspection revealed that the fm on the tip appeared to be dried blood and tissue.Dimensional inspection of the overall length, outer diameter(od) of the middle of the device and od of the proximal section were performed and were within specification.The distal spring tip of the wire was noted to be damaged.The wire was attempted to be inserted into the burr but was unable to be advanced through the returned rotablator plus device, as the coil of the rotablator plus device was damaged.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design & manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-04059.It was reported that the patient's blood pressure went down and removal difficulties occurred.The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery.A 1.25mm rotalink plus and a 330cm rotawire were selected for use.During procedure, the physician encountered difficulty in crossing the rotawire.Subsequently, the rotawire was able to cross the lesion and the burr was loaded.However, the patient's blood pressure started to go down; thus, the physician aspirated the vessel and the blood flow was resolved.The burr was again advanced to the patient's body; however, the burr became stuck in the guide catheter around the secondary curve.The physician maneuvered the burr by pushing and pulling a few times and activate the dynaglide mode to facilitate advancement.The burr was advanced but resistance was still encountered and it kept ejecting the guide catheter out.Thus, it was decided to discontinue the procedure.It was noted that the burr was difficult to remove so the rotawire and the burr were removed as a unit.Thrombus was observed twirled around the rotawire upon removal.There were no further patient complications reported and the patient's condition was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTABLATOR ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA)
302 parkway
la aurora
heredia
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA)
302 parkway
la aurora
heredia
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7516697
MDR Text Key108350865
Report Number2134265-2018-04058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729185871
UDI-Public08714729185871
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSG
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/20/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/05/2019
Device Model NumberH802228240020
Device Catalogue Number22824-002
Device Lot Number21220834
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/09/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/20/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/15/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/17/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/06/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-