• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0502
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problems Mitral Regurgitation (1964); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 04/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The clip remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
This is filed to report the difficult clip deployment and single leaflet device attachment (slda).It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The first clip delivery system (cds 80202u219) was advanced to the mitral valve.The clip was positioned medial of a2p2.Grasping was noted to be difficult.During the deployment sequence, increased resistance was noted retracting the delivery catheter (dc) handle.The handle continued to be retracted, and clip deployment was achieved.After deployment, the clip detached from the anterior leaflet and remained attached to the posterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda).The mr increased to 4.It was also stated that both leaflets were jerked strongly after clip placement because of a large annulus.The posterior leaflet was completely inserted and may have applied force to the anterior leaflet causing the detachment.It was possible that there was leaflet damage; however, this was not confirmed.A second clip was placed on the lateral side of first clip with a residual mr grade of 2.The patient was stable post procedure; however, it was noted that the mr may be getting worse.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.The reported patient effects of recurrent mitral regurgitation (mr) and mitral valve injury (tissue damage) as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use (ifu), are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.Procedural imaging was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular medical advisor who noted that a big force was applied to the clip delivery system (cds) handle to try to pull it back to deploy the clip.This movement displaced the whole valve toward the left atrium and most probably was the cause for the single leaflet device attachment (slda).The detachment from the anterior leaflet probably caused the tearing of the leaflet itself.All available information was investigated and the reported difficulty grasping appears to be related to patient morphology/pathology.The slda was a result of the challenging patient morphology/pathology combined with procedural conditions.A definitive cause for the reported difficulty to deploy the clip could not be determined.The reported tissue damage is a result of the slda and recurrent mr is a cascading effect of the slda and tissue damage.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7523159
MDR Text Key108557949
Report Number2024168-2018-03677
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/20/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/05/2019
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0502
Device Lot Number80202U219
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/24/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/17/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/15/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/20/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age88 YR
Patient Weight51
-
-