• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0502
Device Problem Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 04/25/2018
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The customer reported the device was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.The other two clip delivery systems are filed under separate medwatch report numbers.
 
Event Description
This is filed to report the pericardial effusion that was noted during use of the second device from the second procedure and to report the patient death.It was reported that on (b)(6) 2018 two mitraclips were implanted reducing the degenerative mitral regurgitation from grade 4 to grade 2.The following day, on (b)(6) 2018, the first mitraclip was noted to have a single leaflet device attachment (slda) and mr increased to grade 3 to 4.The clip had detached from the anterior leaflet.Another mitraclip procedure was performed to stabilize the slda clip.A third mitraclip was implanted between the first two mitraclips but after clip deployment, this mitraclip also had an slda.This clip also detached from the anterior leaflet.The physician believes the friable anterior leaflet was the cause of the slda.A fourth clip delivery system was inserted to stabilize the third mitraclip but there was difficulty grasping the leaflets.A pericardial effusion was noted during this case and the procedure was aborted.No treatment was given for the effusion.The patient expired on (b)(6) 2018 from multiple organ failure.In the physician's opinion, the mitraclip did not cause or contribute to the death because the patient died from pre-existing multiple organ failure.There was no additional information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.The reported patient effects of death and pericardial effusion as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported failure to bond (difficulty grasping the leaflets) appears to be related to the challenging patient morphology/pathology (friable anterior leaflet).The reported pericardial effusion appears to be related to procedural circumstances (trigger of the fatal cascade of events combined with maneuvers of grasping attempts) and death is a combination of the pericardial effusion and the pre-existing organ failure.This event was further reviewed by an abbott vascular medical affairs director.The reviewer concluded that in this case, the procedure was conducted in a patient with challenging anatomy: according to the operator, the anterior leaflet was friable, which caused repeated clip detachment during the several attempted implantations in the 2 successive procedures performed.A pericardial effusion was noted during the redo procedure leading to procedure abortion and death 2 days after in a context of multi-organ failure.Death was not related to the device, but to the procedure and the trigger of the fatal cascade of events was the pericardial effusion, leading to hemodynamic compromise, then to multi-organ failure.There is no information to help understand the possible cause of pericardial bleeding.A potential common cause observed in other procedures is atrial wall perforation caused by the transseptal puncture.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7524612
MDR Text Key108610746
Report Number2024168-2018-03700
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/03/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0502
Device Lot Number71102U166
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/25/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/17/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/28/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age92 YR
Patient Weight54
-
-