BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER UPHOLD¿ LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M0068318170 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/02/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold¿ lite with capio slim was used during a vaginal vault prolapse procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, on the first throw of the first leg of the mesh into the right sacrospinous ligament of the patient, the suture broke and was removed from the patient.Reportedly, before the suture broke, the physician applied counter tension when the suture was pulled back.The procedure was completed with another uphold¿ lite with capio slim.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation concluded that the most probable cause for this event is supplier manufacturing process design, and not manufacturing process design as previously reported, because the design or validation of a suppliers manufacturing process was not sufficient to ensure the finished device met the intent of the design.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold lite with capio slim was used during a vaginal vault prolapse procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, on the first throw of the first leg of the mesh into the right sacrospinous ligament of the patient, the suture broke and was removed from the patient.Reportedly, before the suture broke, the physician applied counter tension when the suture was pulled back.The procedure was completed with another uphold lite with capio slim.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold¿ lite with capio slim was used during a vaginal vault prolapse procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, on the first throw of the first leg of the mesh into the right sacrospinous ligament of the patient, the suture broke and was removed from the patient.Reportedly, before the suture broke, the physician applied counter tension when the suture was pulled back.The procedure was completed with another uphold¿ lite with capio slim.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A visual examination of the returned uphold¿ lite with capio slim revealed that the suture on the blue dilator was broken.The dart was located behind the catch of the capio slim cage.There was a small amount of suture attached to it.Analysis revealed no damage to the capio slim suture capturing device.Functional analysis revealed that the device functioned as intended.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicated that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.However, the investigation concluded that the most probable cause for this event is manufacturing process design as the design or validation of the manufacturing process was not sufficient to ensure the finished device met the intent of the design.The investigation concluded that the design of the carrier allows the fiber portion of the suture to interact with the sharp edge of the carrier, resulting in suture severing.The issue is under investigation and a correction has not yet been implemented.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|