• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0501
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Patient Problems Mitral Valve Stenosis (1965); Tissue Damage (2104); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 05/09/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
This event is filed for gripper line break, entrapment of the clip, tissue damage, mitral stenosis and implantation of the clip at an unintended location.It was reported that the patient, with degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr), underwent a mitraclip procedure.The clip delivery system (cds) was advanced and attempts were made to grasp the leaflet.During the 8th grasp attempt, the gripper line broke and the gripper was noted to be caught on the leaflet.The gripper could not be raised due to the gripper line break and the clip was deployed where it became caught, which was on both leaflets, but not at the location the physician wanted to deploy the clip.It was noted that the mean pressure gradient increased to 8 mmhg and a posterior flail was present.The flail was thought to have occurred during attempts to move the clip further into the ventricle when the gripper was stuck on the leaflet.The mr was reduced from grade 4 to grade 3-4; however, due to the increased mean pressure gradient, no additional clips were implanted.The broken gripper line was able to be removed through the gripper lever.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: only the broken gripper line was returned.The reported gripper line break was confirmed as it was returned broken.The reported failure to adhere or bond and entrapment of the device component could not be replicated in a testing environment as they were related to patient/procedural conditions (operational circumstances).As the device was not returned, the reported gripper actuation issue could not be replicated in a testing environment.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.The reported patient effects of mitral stenosis, tissue damage, foreign body in patient as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.All available information was investigated and the reported failure to adhere or bond to the leaflets (difficulty grasping) appears to be related to patient morphology/pathology (posterior prolapse).The gripper line break and subsequent gripper actuation issue and entrapment of the device component was due to the maneuvers performed while attempting to grasp the leaflets; therefore, contributed to procedural conditions.The patient effect mitral stenosis was due to the flail and the flail was due to attempts to move the clip.The foreign body in patient was due the clip being deployed where it was caught.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7555091
MDR Text Key109615772
Report Number2024168-2018-04001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2019
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0501
Device Lot Number80228U253
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/06/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/30/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/03/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/09/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient Weight62
-
-