This is filed to report the inability to remove the gripper line.It was reported that on (b)(6) 2018, the patient, with degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr), underwent a mitraclip procedure treating mr of grade 4+.The patient anatomy included a posterior flail.The clip delivery system (cds) was advanced and multiple attempts were made to grasp the leaflet; however, due to the posterior flail, the clip was unable to grasp the leaflets.After multiple attempts, the clip was able to grasp the leaflet, but the mr was not reduced.The physician decided to deploy the clip and then evaluate the patient for surgical mitral valve replacement surgery.Gripper line removability was tested; however, the gripper line could not be flossed and no movement of the gripper line was noted.Both ends of the gripper line were tested, but neither could be moved.The gripper lines were checked to make sure they were separated and there were no knots noted.The gripper lines were re-wrapped onto the gripper lever.The grippers were raised without issue.The clip was unlocked, inverted, and brought back up into the left atrium.The cds was removed from the anatomy without issue.The mr remained unchanged at grade 4+ and there was no adverse patient effect.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned.All available information was investigated and the reported inability to remove the gripper line was confirmed.The reported failure to adhere or bond could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was related to patient/procedural conditions (operational circumstances).A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.All available information was investigated and the reported failure to adhere bond to the leaflets appears to be related to patient morphology/pathology due to the posterior flail.A definitive cause for the reported inability to remove the gripper line in this incident could not be determined.Subsequently, the inability to remove the gripper line was likely due to a contribution of forces from usage of the device (procedural interaction) in conjunction with the herniation in the lumen coil.There is no indication of product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|