• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0406
Device Problems Kinked (1339); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/07/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coils.During the procedure, while inserting a ruby coil into a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), the physician experienced resistance and subsequently, the ruby coil pusher assembly became severely kinked; therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using additional ruby coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0cm from the proximal end.The pusher assembly was bent approximately 9.5, 37.0, 62.0, 116.0, 122.0, 128.0, 150.0, 172.0, and 182.0 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The embolization coil had offset oil winds.Coagulated blood was found on the embolization coil.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed a kinked device and an embolization coil with offset coil winds.Coagulated blood was found on the embolization coil.If blood became coagulated on the embolization coil, this may have contribute to resistance experienced during the procedure.If the device is forcefully advanced against resistance, damage such as offset coil winds and kinking may occur.Further evaluation revealed bends along the length of the pusher assembly.Based on the return condition of the ruby coil, it is likely that the bends are incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7573712
MDR Text Key110229070
Report Number3005168196-2018-01116
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013169
UDI-Public00814548013169
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,05/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0406
Device Lot NumberF81944
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/18/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/07/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/06/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/30/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/16/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age84 YR
Patient Weight86
-
-