• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ PLUS; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H749236310020
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/18/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-05116.It was reported that rotaburr speed was unstable.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified left anterior descending (lad) artery.A 1.25mm rotalink¿ plus and 1.50mm rotalink¿ plus were selected for use.During the procedure, after ablation was performed successfully using a 1.25mm rotalink¿ burr, a 1.50mm rotalink¿ burr was then used.The operational speed for the 1.50mm burr was set at 230,000rpm outside the patient's body; however, it was noted that the speed increased to 280,000rpm inside the patient's body.Consequently, the 1.50mm rotalink¿ burr was replaced with another 1.25mm rotalink¿ burr.However, it was noted that the same issue occurred wherein the rotational speed raised to and would not decrease from 280,000rpm inside the patient's body.The procedure was completed with a 1.75mm rotalink¿ burr.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The advancer, burr, sheath, coil, and handshake connections were microscopically and visually examined.The annulus of the burr was damaged and flared.Functional testing was performed by connecting the rotablator rotalink plus device to the rotablator control console system.There were no abnormal noises or leaks, as the device did not run; so it wasn¿t able to get any speed.The advancer was dismantled and the ultem was found to be melted.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is user/use error as there was an act or omission of an act that resulted in a different medical device response than intended by the manufacturer or expected by the user: ¿never operate the rotablator advancer without saline infusion.Flowing saline is essential for cooling and lubricating the working parts of the advancer.Operation of the advancer without proper saline infusion may result in permanent damage to the advancer¿.Also, it was reported that the speed was set-up at 230,000rpm and also ran at 200,000rpm.The rotablator dfu the following related to the set-up and operating speeds: ¿adjust the turbine pressure knob until the burr is spinning at the correct speed.1.25 ¿ 2.0mm burrs 190,000 rpm recheck the rotational speed reading to verify that the rotation rate is appropriate for the burr size and lesion type, and adjust the operating speed.1.25 ¿ 2.0mm burrs 160,000 up to 180,000 rpm¿.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-05116.It was reported that rotaburr speed was unstable.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified left anterior descending (lad) artery.A 1.25mm rotalink plus and 1.50mm rotalink plus were selected for use.During the procedure, after ablation was performed successfully using a 1.25mm rotalink burr, a 1.50mm rotalink burr was then used.The operational speed for the 1.50mm burr was set at 230,000rpm outside the patient's body; however, it was noted that the speed increased to 280,000rpm inside the patient's body.Consequently, the 1.50mm rotalink burr was replaced with another 1.25mm rotalink burr.However, it was noted that the same issue occurred wherein the rotational speed raised to and would not decrease from 280,000rpm inside the patient's body.The procedure was completed with a 1.75mm rotalink burr.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ PLUS
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7579552
MDR Text Key110457212
Report Number2134265-2018-05359
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729316411
UDI-Public08714729316411
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/18/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/30/2019
Device Model NumberH749236310020
Device Catalogue Number23631-002
Device Lot Number21670397
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/23/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/18/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/07/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/26/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/29/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-