|
Model Number 40S06 |
Device Problems
Occlusion Within Device (1423); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
|
Patient Problems
Thrombosis (2100); Stenosis (2263)
|
Event Date 07/09/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately seven months post placement of a left forearm vascular graft, the patient experienced stenosis of vascular access of the venous and arterial anastomosis and thrombosis of vascular access.Reportedly, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and a thrombectomy was performed; final angiogram revealed good flow.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial, that approximately seven months post placement of a left forearm vascular graft, the patient experienced stenosis of vascular access of the venous and arterial anastomosis and thrombosis of vascular access.Reportedly, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and a thrombectomy was performed; final angiogram revealed good flow.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.The device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the device.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.A review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|