• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT; MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0501
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problems Mitral Regurgitation (1964); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 05/16/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The clip remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The other implanted clips are filed under separate medwatch reports.
 
Event Description
This is filed to report the single leaflet device attachment (slda) and tissue damage.Clip delivery system (cds-71027u265) it was reported that on (b)(6) 2018, the patient, with grade 4 mixed mitral regurgitation and tethered leaflets underwent a mitraclip procedure.The first clip was successfully implanted.The second cds (80127u146) advanced.Some difficulty was noted attaching the clip to the leaflets due to the tethered leaflets.Leaflet insertion assessment was performed, and it was felt that both leaflets were well inserted and the clip was deployed.Immediately after clip deployment, it was noted that the clip had detached from the anterior leaflet, remaining attached to the posterior leaflet.A third cds (80103u146) was then advanced and the clip placed on the leaflets.The same issue occurred as with the previous clip; however, this clip immediately detached from the posterior leaflet, remaining attached to the anterior leaflet.A fourth cds (71027u265) was advanced and placed on the leaflets.The same issue occurred with the clip remaining attached only to the anterior leaflet.Tissue damage was noted, which was possibly due to the difficulty grasping.Echo was reviewed and it was felt that the 3rd and 4th clips had never been fully attached to both leaflets.The physician felt that during leaflet insertion assessment, he was actually seeing the first implanted clip and not the clip pending deployment.Visualization was difficult due to patient anatomy and the echosonographer.No additional intervention was performed.Mr remained unchanged at grade 4+.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Failure to follow steps/instructions.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.The reported patient effects of worsening mitral regurgitation (mr) and mitral valve injury (tissue damage), as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use (ifu), are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.Additionally, the ifu instructs the user to rotate the delivery catheter (dc) handle to align the clip arms perpendicular to the line of coaptation.All available information was investigated and the reported difficult grasping appears to be due to the challenging patient anatomy (tethered leaflets) and user technique.The reported single leaflet device attachment (slda) appears to be primarily due to the user error of not confirming if the clip arms were perpendicular to the line of coaptation and due to the patients tethered leaflets.The mitral valve injury and unchanged mr appear to be related to the slda.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM NT
Type of Device
MITRACLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7581037
MDR Text Key110450357
Report Number2024168-2018-04304
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/20/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0501
Device Lot Number71027U265
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/16/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/07/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/15/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/20/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age87 YR
Patient Weight69
-
-