The reason for this revision surgery was due to the poly locking pin coming out, poly wear and condyle screw being broken.The previous surgery and the revision detailed in this investigation occurred 11.2 years apart.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history record (dhr) was not conducted since the item and or lot number was not provided or determined during the complaint evaluation.No additional information was obtained to assist in the event identification.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.As of 22-jun-2018, no records have been forwarded by zimmer-biomet concerning this event.Should zimmer-biomet provide additional information concerning this complaint, the complaint will be re-opened and a further review shall be conducted.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to due to the poly locking pin coming out, poly wear and condyle screw being broken.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.Inventory containment is not required since there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|