As reported to customer relations: "customer put device into the patient over a savary wire and the device would not deploy.Device pumped, but wouldn't deploy out of delivery system.It was in gear.Customer heard a pop sound, took device out and used a new one successfully." dm unsure regarding event date.
|
Pma/510(k) # = k162717.(b)(4) importer.Exemption number: e2016031.Information pertaining to section g.1 as follows: importer site contact and address:(b)(4).Importer site establishment registration number: (b)(4).Problem statement: ¿device wouldn't deploy out of delivery system¿ "customer put device into the patient over a wire and the device would not deploy.Device pumped, but wouldn't deploy out of delivery system.It was in gear.Customer heard a pop sound, took device out and used a new one successfully." device evaluation: the evo-20-25-8-e device of lot number c1306668 was not returned to cook ireland for evaluation.Additional information received: 1.Did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? no.2.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no.3.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? no.4.Has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.5.Has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? no.1.1.1 what is the reorder number of the wire guide used with this device? unknown, but probably--(b)(4).1.1.2 if not, with the device in question, how was the procedure finished? another device opened and used successfully.1.2 for complaints occurring during use (once in contact with patient) also ask: 1.2.1 what is the endoscope manufacturer and model number that was used during the procedure? olympus 190.1.2.2 had dilation of the stricture been performed prior to stent placement? no, not needed.1.2.3 what was the diameter of the stricture at the time of stent placement (in mm)? unknown.1.2.4 what was the length of the stricture at the time of stent placement (in cm)? unknown.1.2.5 please describe the location in the body where the stent was to be placed.Esophogus.1.2.6 was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide through the stricture? no.1.2.7 was resistance encountered when advancing the introducer and stent into position? no.1.2.8 did any section of the device detach inside the patient? no.1.2.9 was the stent partially deployed when removed from the patient? no.1.2.10 after placement, was stent position verified? n/a didn't get that far.1.2.10.1 if yes, please describe how.1.2.11 after placement, was the endoscope advanced through the stent? n/a didn't get that far.1.2.12 please estimate amount of time the stent was in place prior to this occurrence.N/a didn't get that far.1.2.13 did the patient undergo chemotherapy or radiation treatments after stent placement? unknown.There is no evidence to suggest that this event did not occur, therefore the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.Lab evaluation: as the device was not returned; a lab evaluation could not be conducted.Root cause: as the device was not returned at the time of the investigation and due to the lack of information provided, the cause of this complaint could not be conclusively determined.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.Documents review: with the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.A review of the manufacturing records for evo-20-25-8-e of lot number c1306668 revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Prior to distribution all evo-20-25-8-e devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.Ifu review: as per the instructions for use, which accompanies this device instructs the user to "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".On review of the information provided, there is no evidence to suggest that the user did not follow the instructions for use.Summary: there is no evidence to suggest that this event did not occur, therefore the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.From the information provided, there have been no adverse effects to the patient as a result of this occurrence.Another device was used for deployment.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
Reporting is based on the precedence of ¿flexor kinked/stretched/broke/compressed".As reported to customer relations: "customer put device into the patient over a savary wire and the device would not deploy.Device pumped, but wouldn't deploy out of delivery system.It was in gear.Customer heard a pop sound, took device out and used a new one successfully." dm unsure regarding event date.
|