This is filed to report the difficult to remove and leaflet tear with the clip delivery system (cds 80115u245).It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The first mitraclip ntr cds (80115u262) was advanced to the mitral valve.The clip was implanted, reducing mr to 3.A second mitraclip ntr cds (80115u245) was advanced; however, when positioning the clip, the clip got stuck in the chordae.Troubleshooting was performed and the clip was freed; however, a chordal rupture occurred creating a posterior leaflet flail.The mr returned to 4.Grasping attempts were performed, but unsuccessful due to the anatomy.The clip was not implanted and the cds was removed.A mitraclip xtr cds (80119u142) was advanced to treat the chordae rupture/ leaflet flail; however, grasping was unsuccessful due to the anatomy.The decision was made deploy the clip close to the commissure, reducing mr to 3-4.After deployment, the clip detached from the anterior leaflet, and remained attached to the posterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda), and the mr returned to 4.There was less left ventricular ejection fraction caused by the severity of mr; therefore, an impella heart pump was placed.The patient was scheduled for mitral valve replacement on (b)(6) 2018; however, the patient died on (b)(6) 2018 due to heart decompensation and multi-organ dysfunction.Per the physicians opinion, the flail in combination with the slda caused the patient death.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific product quality issue.All available information was investigated and the reported physical resistance appears to be due to user technique/procedural conditions as the device interacted with the anatomy while positioning was performed.The reported tissue damage appears to be due to physical resistance as the choral rupture was noted to the posterior mitral valve leaflet (pml).The reported failure to adhere or bond appears to be due to the noted choral rupture that resulted in flail pml.It should be noted that the reported patient effect of mitral valve injury (tissue damage) is listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing, or labeling of the device.
|