Catalog Number CDS0502 |
Device Problems
Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Mitral Valve Stenosis (1965); Tissue Damage (2104)
|
Event Date 05/24/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant medical products: other mitraclip (part #70621u132).Steerable guide catheter (part #80124u127).The mitraclip remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
This report is being filed since post mitraclip deployment, a small chordal rupture was observed and the mean mitral valve gradient was 6 mmhg.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure treating functional mitral regurgitation (mr) grade 4 with slightly thick leaflets.One mitraclip was implanted on the medial anterior leaflet 2 (a2) and posterior leaflet 2 (p2) leaflets without issue.Residual mr was present so a second mitraclip (cds 70807u125) was positioned on the lateral a2/p2 area.Although grasping was performed without issue, the first grasp attempt was not satisfactory.The second grasp was deemed successful, reducing the mr to grade 1-2.Leaflet insertion assessment was satisfactory and this clip was deployed.Post deployment and while removing the delivery system, a residual higher mr was noted and a small chordal rupture occurred just lateral to the second implanted clip.The mean gradient was 6 mmhg and it was decided not to implant a third clip as treatment.The mr had been reduced to grade 2 and the procedure ended.No treatment was reported.There was no adverse patient sequela and there was no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided regarding this issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the previously filled medwatch report, additional information was obtained: the leaflets could be grasped easily with cds 70807u125, however, the residual mitral regurgitation was not satisfactory on the first grasp.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.The reported patient effects of tissue damage and mitral stenosis, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use (ifu), are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.Based on the information reviewed, the reported tissue damage and mitral stenosis in this incident appears to be related to patient morphology/pathology and/or user technique/procedural conditions; and unrelated to the device since there was no reported device issue/malfunction during the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|