(b)(4).Batch # r92p2j, r92e77.Per photographic analysis: there was no sample received for analysis.Only pictures of the sample were received for analysis.Upon visual inspection of the pictures, it appears like the duckbill was separated from the device.However, no definitive conclusion could be reached as to the cause of the reported incident as the device was not returned for analysis.The photos do not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Hands on analysis should provide the evidence necessary to confirm the root cause.The batch history record was reviewed and no defects, ncr¿s or protocols related to the complaint, were found during the manufacturing process.
|
(b)(4).Device analysis: the analysis results found that tb12lt device was received with the universal seal cap separated from the universal seal base.During visual examination, was noted to have insufficient welding resulting in the universal seal cap and the universal seal base being separated and the inner seal assembly out of position.Therefore, this is associated to not being properly welded during the manufacturing process.
|