Rod 1, lot 140922-10: a visual inspection of the returned rod revealed it was partially distracted with score marks on the distraction rod.Functional testing with the manual distractor and erc revealed that the rod was unable to distract or retract.Excessive force was used to remove the distraction rod and it was confirmed the unit to have a broken locking pin.A review of the lot history record for the device revealed that the device met all of the required quality inspections and that the products were released within specifications.Rod 2, 150930-08: a visual inspection of the returned rod revealed it was partially distracted with score marks on the distraction rod.Functional testing with the manual distractor was unable to distract, however with the erc unit the rod was able to distract.The distraction force was found to be within specification, and the rod was confirmed to be functioning as intended.A review of the lot history record for the device revealed that the device met all of the required quality inspections and that the products were released within specifications.
|