(b)(4).A device history record (dhr) review was performed and there were no issues found that could relate to the reported complaint.The device was manufactured according to release specification.The sample was returned and sent to the manufacturer (tianjin medis) for evaluation.Tianjin reports that a new mold was introduced to production in october 2016.In (b)(6) 2016, it was identified through 100% functional test that it may not be as easy to insert the syringe into the female conical fitting (luer) of the cuff pilot produced on this new mold.The device passed the required release criteria.At this time the new mold was removed and reverted to the original mold.Upon investigation, it was found that the drawing stipulating the inner diameter of the female conical fitting (luer) for the cuff pilot was not sufficiently clear with respect to the tolerance range.This allowed for devices to be manufactured closer to the lower range of the required tolerance, however the device was manufactured within tolerance therefore the complaint could not be confirmed.At this lower range, it may not be as easy for the user to insert the syringe into the female conical fitting (luer).
|