It was reported via a journal article title: aortic valve replacement through right minithoracotomy: is it really biologically minimally invasive? author(s): elisa mikus, md, simone turci, md, simone calvi, md, massimo ricci, md, luca dozza, ms, and mauro del giglio, md, phd.Citation: ann thorac surg 2015; 99:826¿30; http://dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/j.Athoracsur.2014.09.046.The purpose of this study was to present the authors¿ experience with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (miavr), whether the minimally invasive surgical approach corresponds to a minimal biological damage, and which are the key factors making a cardiac operation biologically less invasive.Between jan2010 and mar2014, 206 patients (n=129 male and n=77 female; mean age of 71.5±12.0 years) with diagnosis of either degenerative aortic valve stenosis, aortic regurgitation or mixed, underwent miavr.In the procedure, the prosthetic valve was implanted with three running 2/0 120-cm prolene sutures.The ascending aorta incision was closed with double 5/0 prolene sutures.Postoperatively, there were 3 cases of wound dehiscence or infection among the subjects.The advantage of this surgical technique includes lower incidence of wound complications, especially in high-risk, obese, diabetic or osteoporotic patients.Miavr-rt can be biologically minimally invasive, rather than only an aesthetic choice, as long as low operative times and total central cannulation can be guaranteed; at these conditions, it provides a feasible and promising alternative to conventional valve surgery.
|