• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Energy Output Problem (1431); No Device Output (1435); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Improper Device Output (2953)
Patient Problems Device Overstimulation of Tissue (1991); Seizures (2063); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Urinary Frequency (2275); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 01/01/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the consumer regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient had intermittent communication and every once in a while ¿it comes on¿.The patient needed the ins off for a procedure (unrelated to the implanted device) and they were finally able to turn it off.After the procedure, the patient went home and had trouble turning it back on although they finally got it back on.When the patient used the programmer during the report, they got poor communication.When it was confirmed that the antenna was securely attached and synchronized to the implantable neurostimulator (ins), the issue was not resolved.When the programmer was placed directly over the ins and synchronized the poor communication was still not resolved (poor communication occurred with and without the antenna attached).A new antenna was sent to the patient.It was noted that the patient was trying to turn the device off again because when they try it on the stimulation came on really high.When asked if it was still felt high, the patient did not answer.In addition, the patient reported that they started having problems/symptoms again (therapy stopped helping) and had been having to increase the stimulation as a result.This started a few months ago.It was noted that the patient saw the physician assistant (pa) who ¿messed around and said it was fine¿.However the patient mentioned they still had to ¿go up and up¿ to stop going to the bathroom.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Further information provided by the patient indicated that they have seizures.There were no further complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7634231
MDR Text Key112204243
Report Number3004209178-2018-14212
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2013
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/21/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/25/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/21/2018
08/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/19/2018
10/04/2018
Date Device Manufactured05/04/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age76 YR
-
-