• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The events were reported through a journal article and it is unknown if the events have been previously reported.No product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.
 
Event Description
It was reported in a journal article entitled: retrospective analysis of sutureless skin closure in cleft lip repair author: rajshekhar halli, mds; ajit joshi, mds; yogesh kini, mds, dnb; viraj kharkar, mds; manjula hebbale, mds citation: the journal of craniofacial surgery & volume 23, number 1, january 2012; doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318241db01.The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate the results of skin closure with amcrylate in comparison to suturing with 6-0 prolene in cleft lip repair.The study included 60 patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip cases and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, wherein the control group (group 1) with 12 males and 18 females consisted of skin closure with 6-0 prolene and the study group (group 2) with 16 males and 14 females consisted of skin closure with amcrylate (iso amyl 2-cyanoacrylate).A standard surgical protocol for cleft lip repair using millard¿s advancement-rotation technique performed by a single surgeon was used in both groups to avoid bias.The repair was a 3-layer closure: mucosa, muscle, and skin.The skin edges were sutured using 6-0 prolene in group 1.Wound infection occurred in 1 of the patients in group 1.In conclusion, excellent cosmetic results were obtained using amcrylate, which was assessed by 5 different observers as per vas and significance testing with mann-whitney test.Three of 5 observers voted in favor of cyanoacrylate to produce better cosmetic results and the remaining 2 voted against the use of cyanoacrylate with only a minimal statistical difference.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE
Type of Device
SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7635097
MDR Text Key112281375
Report Number2210968-2018-73756
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K133356
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/08/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/25/2018
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-