It was reported in a journal article entitled: retrospective analysis of sutureless skin closure in cleft lip repair author: rajshekhar halli, mds; ajit joshi, mds; yogesh kini, mds, dnb; viraj kharkar, mds; manjula hebbale, mds citation: the journal of craniofacial surgery & volume 23, number 1, january 2012; doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318241db01.The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate the results of skin closure with amcrylate in comparison to suturing with 6-0 prolene in cleft lip repair.The study included 60 patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip cases and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, wherein the control group (group 1) with 12 males and 18 females consisted of skin closure with 6-0 prolene and the study group (group 2) with 16 males and 14 females consisted of skin closure with amcrylate (iso amyl 2-cyanoacrylate).A standard surgical protocol for cleft lip repair using millard¿s advancement-rotation technique performed by a single surgeon was used in both groups to avoid bias.The repair was a 3-layer closure: mucosa, muscle, and skin.The skin edges were sutured using 6-0 prolene in group 1.Wound infection occurred in 1 of the patients in group 1.In conclusion, excellent cosmetic results were obtained using amcrylate, which was assessed by 5 different observers as per vas and significance testing with mann-whitney test.Three of 5 observers voted in favor of cyanoacrylate to produce better cosmetic results and the remaining 2 voted against the use of cyanoacrylate with only a minimal statistical difference.
|