• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO BCT TRIMA ACCEL; TRIMA ACCEL LRS PLATELET,SAMPLER, AUTOPAS, PLASMA, RBC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO BCT TRIMA ACCEL; TRIMA ACCEL LRS PLATELET,SAMPLER, AUTOPAS, PLASMA, RBC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82420
Device Problems High Test Results (2457); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Data Problem (3196)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 06/03/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation : the run data file (rdf) was analyzed for this event.Alerts that could contribute to wbc contamination of the platelet product, such as ¿centrifuge pressure high¿ or ¿rbc spillover¿, were not generated in the run data file analyzed.As the rbc detector cannot count the cells passing by, in order to generate a ¿potential wbc contamination detected¿ message,the rbc detector signals must see a significant change in the reflectance values.In this case, rbc detector reflectance signals did not indicate that wbcs were escaping the lrs chamber.Therefore, the run data file reported that the platelet product could be labeled as leukoreduced.Run data file analysis showed that frequent ¿return pressure too high¿ and ¿draw pressure too low¿ alerts were generated during this procedure.In response to these alerts, the operator made multiple draw and return flow adjustments.These adjustments reduced the inlet flow, and therefore the flow through the lrs chamber.When the flow through the lrs chamber is greatly reduced, the risks of wbc contamination are increased.While the trima accel system is typically robust against numerous flow alerts and adjustments, it is possible that the high number of alerts and adjustments that occurred during short periods throughout the procedure could have disrupted the steady-state of the system and contributed to the igher-than-expected wbc content in the platelet product.Based on the available information, it is also possible that this leukoreduction failure could be donor-related.Investigation is in process.A follow-up report will be provided.
 
Event Description
The customer would like the run data file investigated to determine a possible cause for the elevated white blood cell (wbc) content in the platelet product.There was not a transfusion recipient or patient involved at the time of the residual white blood cell (rwbc) testing, therefore no patient information is reasonably known at the time of the event.The platelet collection set is not available for return because it was discarded by the customer.This product is not available within the us, but this report is being filed due to an alleged failure that could occur on a similarly marketed device platform cleared for use by the fda.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being filed to provide additional information and corrected information.Investigation: the device history records (dhr) were reviewed for this lot.There were no events noted in the dhr that would have contributed to the elevated wbc count experienced by the customer.Root cause: alerts that could contribute to wbc contamination of the platelet product, such as¿centrifuge pressure high¿ or ¿rbc spillover¿, were not generated in the run data file analyzed.As the rbc detector cannot count the cells passing by, in order to generate a ¿potential wbc contamination detected¿ message, the rbc detector signals must see a significant change in the reflectance values.In this case, rbc detector reflectance signals did not indicate that wbcs were escaping the lrs chamber.Therefore, the run data file reported that the platelet product could be labeled as leukoreduced.Run data file analysis showed that frequent ¿return pressure too high¿ and ¿draw pressure too low¿ alerts were generated during this procedure.In response to these alerts, the operator made multiple draw and return flow adjustments.These adjustments reduced the inlet flow, and therefore the flow through the lrs chamber.When the flow through the lrs chamber is greatly reduced, the risks of wbc contamination are increased.While the trima accel automated blood collection system is typically robust against numerous flow alerts and adjustments, it is possible that the high number of alerts and adjustments that occurred during short periods throughout the procedure could have disrupted the steady-state of the system and contributed to the higher-than-expected wbc content in the platelet product.Based on the available information, it is also possible that this leukoreduction failure could be donor-related.
 
Event Description
Donation id: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIMA ACCEL
Type of Device
TRIMA ACCEL LRS PLATELET,SAMPLER, AUTOPAS, PLASMA, RBC
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO BCT
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer Contact
steve kern
10810 w.collins ave
lakewood, CO 80215
3032392246
MDR Report Key7645978
MDR Text Key113173127
Report Number1722028-2018-00184
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GKT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/28/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/01/2019
Device Catalogue Number82420
Device Lot Number1708151330
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/05/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/28/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/11/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/18/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/23/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-