On (b)(6) 2018, the lay user/patient contacted lifescan (lfs) usa, alleging that her onetouch verio flex meter read inaccurately high compared to her feelings and/or normal readings.The complaint was classified based on the customer service representative (csr) documentation.The patient reported that the meter issue begun a month prior to her contacting lfs.She reported that, on (b)(6) 2018 around 4 am, she had obtained an alleged inaccurate high blood glucose reading on the subject meter, of ¿267 mg/dl¿.Meter to feelings/normal results comparisons do not meet the criteria necessary for lfs to determine an inaccuracy.The patient reported that she manages her diabetes with insulin (self-adjuster), and in response to the alleged meter issue she had increased her humalog insulin (dose unknown).The patient reported that shortly after administering the insulin, she developed symptoms of ¿face dripping wet and drenched¿.In response to the symptoms around 5 am on (b)(6) 2018, she self-treated by eating something and drinking some milk.During troubleshooting, the csr confirmed that the unit of measure was set correctly on the subject meter, and that the patient¿s test strips had been stored correctly, were within expiry date.The csr noted the patient did not have control solution.Replacement products were sent to the patient.This complaint is being reported because the patient reportedly developed symptoms of a serious injury adverse event while using the subject meter.There is insufficient information to rule out the contribution of the subject meter to the event.
|
The lay user/patients meter and test strips have been returned and evaluated by lifescan product analysis with the following findings: the meter passed all testing with no faults found.The reported issue could not be confirmed.In addition, a device history record review was performed on the subject meter lot.The review did not identify anything that could adversely impact product performance or function.Lifescan also conducted an evaluation of the test strip lot and concluded that this lot did not breach the thresholds set for escalation and no systemic issue was observed.Analysis was not possible for the returned test strips due to unknown storage and handling preventing the allegation being physically investigated.If lifescan obtains additional information regarding this complaint, a follow-up report will be submitted.At this time, lifescan considers this matter closed.
|