It was reported that the patient was referred for replacement.It was indicated that the reason for the referral was due to high impedance, and that the patient has experienced mood swings, which may be caused by the high impedance.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.No additional or relevant information has been received to date.
|
Product analysis for the lead was completed and approved.An analysis was performed on the returned lead portions of the lead.A portion of the lead assembly was not returned for analysis and therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During the visual analysis of the returned portion, the coil appeared to be broken approximately 2mm from the end of the electrode bifurcation area.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the connector end of the coil break (found at 2mm) and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type with fine pitting and residual material on three of the broken coil strands.Low magnification sem analysis of the coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution.With the exception of the observed discontinuity, the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
|