|
Model Number H80222782001A0 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 06/13/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-06260.It was reported that the speed was unstable.A rotalink¿ advancer and a rotablator console were selected for use.During preparation, the cables were connected respectively to the console and the compressed air pressure is evaluated at 100 psi.Then, the physician introduced the rotawire to the proximal end of the 1.50mm rotalink¿ burr and advancer already mounted obtaining it in its back.The draw test then was realized; however, it was noted that the burr rotates in fluctuating revolutions.The set operational speed was at 150,000 rpms but it went from 220,000 to 120,000 in less than 3 seconds with the pedal fully depressed.Also, the sound of revolutions was unusual from the advancer.It was assessed that everything was well connected with the required pressure so the physician tried again obtaining the same results.Physician decided to remove the rotaburr and disconnected the advancer from the rotalink burr.It was then noted that the rotalink burr was slightly bent in a segment proximal the handshake connection.The procedure was completed with a 1.75mm rotalink¿ plus.No patient complications were reported and patient's status was stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-06260.It was reported that the speed was unstable.A rotalink advancer and a rotablator console were selected for use.During preparation, the cables were connected respectively to the console and the compressed air pressure is evaluated at 100 psi.Then, the physician introduced the rotawire to the proximal end of the 1.50mm rotalink burr and advancer already mounted obtaining it in its back.The draw test then was realized; however, it was noted that the burr rotates in fluctuating revolutions.The set operational speed was at 150,000 rpms but it went from 220,000 to 120,000 in less than 3 seconds with the pedal fully depressed.Also, the sound of revolutions was unusual from the advancer.It was assessed that everything was well connected with the required pressure so the physician tried again obtaining the same results.Physician decided to remove the rotaburr and disconnected the advancer from the rotalink burr.It was then noted that the rotalink burr was slightly bent in a segment proximal the handshake connection.The procedure was completed with a 1.75mm rotalink plus.No patient complications were reported and patient's status was stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for analysis.Returned product consisted of a rotalink advancer.The advancer and handshake connections were microscopically and visually examined.Functional testing was performed by connecting the advancer to the rotablator control console system.There were no abnormal noises or leaks and the device did not run; so it wasn¿t able to get any speed.The advancer was dismantled and the ultem was found to be melted and the turbine is corroded.A melted ultem is due to the interruption of saline or by insufficient flow of saline used during the preparation or during the procedure of the device.Saline is used in the clinical setting to cool and lubricate the moving parts and prevents a melted ultem, ensuring the functional use of the device.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is user / use error as there was an act or omission of an act that resulted in a different medical device response than intended by the manufacturer or expected by the user.The dfu states: ¿never operate the rotablator advancer without saline infusion.Flowing saline is essential for cooling and lubricating the working parts of the advancer.Operation of the advancer without proper saline infusion may result in permanent damage to the advancer¿.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|