The patient's age at time of event or dob, gender, and weight are unknown.The facility declined to provide this information.During withdrawal, pieces from the distal portion of the device separated inside the patient, but was able to be removed.No piece of the device was retained in the patient.Patient information regarding relevant tests/laboratory data or medical history is unknown.This information was not available from the facility.The lot number, expiration date, udi number, and device manufacture date are unknown.The lot number was not provided by the facility.The angiosculpt device was returned in two pieces.The distal tip, distal bond, scoring element, intermediate bond, proximal bond, transition tubing, and guide wire exit port were not returned.The balloon and marker bands were intact.The shaft had multiple kinks and separated approximately 42" from the hub.It is likely that using two devices within the same guideliner resulted in difficulty withdrawing the angiosculpt device.The excessive force applied by the user caused or contributed to the device separation.Per the ifu, retained device component is listed as a possible adverse effect of the procedure.
|
The angiosculpt was used together with a poba inside a guide liner to treat a bifurcation lesion in the lad diagonal.During withdrawal, the angiosculpt was unable to be removed, thus the physician applied excessive force and the distal shaft separated.The poba was inflated inside the guide liner to trap the angiosculpt.The angiosculpt, poba, and guide liner were removed as a unit, leaving the guide wire in place.A new angiosculpt was used to complete the procedure.No piece of the angiosculpt device was retained in the patient.
|