• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD10; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD10; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPOD10
Device Problems Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/20/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the hypogastric artery using pod10s.During the procedure, while attempting to advance a pod10 through a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), the physician experienced resistance and the pod10 pusher assembly became kinked.Subsequently, the pod10 would not advance smoothly and therefore, was removed.The procedure was completed using another pod10 and the same lantern.There was no report of adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pod10 had bends at approximately 32.0 cm and 44.0 cm from the proximal end of the pusher.Kinks were found approximately 78.5 cm and 119.5 cm from the proximal end of the pusher.A fracture was found approximately 118.0 cm from the proximal end of the pusher.The embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly inside the introducer sheath.The pod10 was fractured; therefore, functional analysis could not be performed.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned pod10 revealed kink, bend, and fracture damage along the length of the pusher assembly.These damages may have been a result of forcefully advancing the device against resistance.As reported in the complaint, some of the damage occurred outside the patient body post-procedure.The microcatheter identified in the complaint was not returned for evaluation; therefore, the root cause of the resistance experienced could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed the embolization coil was detached.If the pusher assembly becomes fractured it will likely allow the pull wire to retract from the distal detachment tip (ddt), detaching the embolization coil.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD10
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7700192
MDR Text Key114409724
Report Number3005168196-2018-01411
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019659
UDI-Public00814548019659
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,06/20/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD10
Device Lot NumberF82203
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/19/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/20/2018
Initial Date FDA Received07/18/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/19/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/06/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-