The pacemaker was returned for analysis and underwent a routine status interrogation after it had been received.During the interrogation, a notification message appeared on the programmer referring to the state of the battery.The device status was eri after approximately 95 months of operating time.In a next step, the charge drawn from the battery was checked.The battery depletion proved to be as expected.The memory content of the device was analyzed.The analysis indicates that the activation of the battery status eri on (b)(6) 2018 resulted from a temporarily slightly increased current uptake.No other irregularities were found.The cause of the occurred resets could not be determined because the information in the device memory did no longer exist due to the manual reset performed by the clinic.In a next step, the pacemakers capability to provide therapy was tested.The antibradycardic output signal matched the programmed values, and the signal sensing of the device was normal.The pacemaker showed specification-conforming behavior in regard to its device functions.The current uptake, in particular, was normal and as expected.In addition, the manufacturing process of this device was reviewed.The production documents did not show any anomalies.All manufacturing steps had been carried out correctly.A performed standard final electrical test documented proper device behavior.In summary, the analysis indicated a temporarily increased current uptake of the pacemaker, which then led to the battery status eri.The cause of the temporarily increased current uptake could, however not be determined.During the analysis, the pacemaker functioned normally, and the current uptake, in particular, was normal and as expected.The cause of the occurred resets and the respective message could not be determined based on the available data.There was no material defect or manufacturing error.
|