• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3023
Device Problems Break (1069); Degraded (1153); Difficult to Remove (1528); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Device Sensing Problem (2917); Impedance Problem (2950); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Hematoma (1884); Nausea (1970); Scar Tissue (2060); Urinary Retention (2119); Electric Shock (2554); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 3886, lot# l97836, implanted: (b)(6) 2001, explanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead.Product id: 3095-10, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2009, explanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: extension.Information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3886, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: (b)(6) 2005, udi#: (b)(4); product id: 3095-10, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: (b)(6) 2012, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding their implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation.It was reported that patient's ins, extension, and lead was surgically removed and replaced the friday before the report.It was noted that the doctor could not detect the leads in (b)(6), so they scheduled the patient for system replacement.During the surgery, the extension and lead were found in pieces and looked like a corroded battery with white stuff.The doctor had difficulty removing the lead and extension due to these issues, and was able to remove most of the white substance but not all.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient stated her body rejected the lead and had replacement.Patient said the white stuff she thought was battery acid was her body rejecting the lead.Patient said after the removed the device they implanted the system on the left side.Patient said she has a huge lump or hematoma still and they could feel it from where they were digging around.She said, she has a whole bunch of scars.Patient said she was systematic and having shocks with the old device.Patient said he replaced the ins in 2009 due to normal battery depletion but didn't replace the leads, and maybe that is why her body rejected the lead.Patient said after the removed this device they implanted the system on the left side.Patient said she has a huge lump or hematoma still and they could feel it from where they were digging around.She said, she has a whole bunch of scars.When the doctor ran impedances he didn't get any numbers back.Patient said she felt like the device wasn't working right.The lead was not replaced, and maybe that is why her body rejected the lead.The surgery was 3 hours long instead of an hour and a half.Patient said she got a little nauseous that time.Patient said they didn't put in a catheter probably because they didn't' think the surgery was going to last that long.Patient had an extended bladder and had to go home for the weekend with a cath.Patient said she also had a reaction to the antibiotic and she broke out in a rash.No further patient complications are anticipated or expected as a result of this event.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.They reported that they left the lead in because they didn't want to traumatize the area any further.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key7723798
MDR Text Key115187232
Report Number3004209178-2018-16753
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994287731
UDI-Public00613994287731
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2010
Device Model Number3023
Device Catalogue Number3023
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/24/2018
Initial Date FDA Received07/26/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/08/2018
02/06/2020
08/04/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/04/2018
02/21/2020
08/25/2023
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-