BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M00564890 |
Device Problem
Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/06/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2018 that an ultraflex tracheobronchial covered distal release stent was to be used to treat a malignant stenosis in the airway during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the stent was able to be deployed but was not fully expanded.The stent was removed with forceps and another ultraflex tracheobronchial stent was used to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient¿s condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on july 6, 2018 that an ultraflex tracheobronchial covered distal release stent was to be used to treat a malignant stenosis in the airway during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the stent was able to be deployed but was not fully expanded.The stent was removed with forceps and another ultraflex tracheobronchial stent was used to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient¿s condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A deployed and expanded ultraflex tracheobronchial covered distal release stent was received for analysis; the delivery system was not returned.Visual examination identified no issues with the stent.The stent was measured to be within specifications.The analysis of the returned device could not confirm the reported event that the stent failed to expand; however, a photo of the device provided by the complainant shows a stent that was not fully expanded.This confirms the reported event.Taking all available information into consideration, the reported event was likely due to anatomical/ procedural factors encountered during the procedure, which limited the performance of the device.Therefore, the most probable root cause is operational context.A labeling review was performed, and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A search of the complaint database revealed that no other similar complaints exist for the specified batch.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|