• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Vibration (1674); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Micturition Urgency (1871); Incontinence (1928); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Urinary Frequency (2275); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 05/25/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.The patient reported that she was having difficulty with the device since implant.The patient stated that the device was loose inside of her, and it didn't work all the time.The patient reported that sometimes it vibrates really hard and other times it doesn't work at all.Patient services explained that you don't have to feel the stimulation for it to work.The caller reported that she is just having symptoms and that she has the device for the bladder.The patient stated that she was having leaking, urgency, and frequency.The patient stated that she has had relief but not really, and is looking to get more benefit.The patient confirmed that stim was on, program 1 at 2.1 volts.It was noted that the patient felt stimulation in the correct area (bike seat area).The patient tried increasing stim on program 1 up to 3.6 and stated that it was painful.Patient services assisted her in decreasing it to where it was comfortable and she brought it back to 2.1 volts.The patient stated that it was not comfortable if goes above 2.1.The patient switched to program 2 and increased to 2.7 volts.Patient services reviewed that it takes time for the body to respond to therapy, therefore titrations should be discussed with her healthcare provider (hcp).The patient was redirected to their hcp if the problem did not resolve.No further complications were anticipated/reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7728486
MDR Text Key116260857
Report Number3004209178-2018-16870
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/28/2019
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/20/2018
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/03/2018
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age35 YR
-
-