|
Model Number ZA9003 |
Device Problem
Difficult to Insert (1316)
|
Patient Problem
Vitrectomy (2643)
|
Event Date 06/27/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reportedly, the lens was not implanted; therefore not explanted.Reason for non-evaluation: it was indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device/lot history record, labeling, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the doctor had issues when implanting the lens.A vitrectomy was performed.However, there was no patient injury.Further information was provided and reported the following additional details on the event.This was a complex case.The za9003 lens wasn¿t able to be implanted.Implantation was attempted with the emerald injector and emerald cartridge.There wasn¿t a problem with the lens or cartridge.No additional information was provided to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).Sex/gender: male.Based on new information received, patient's affected eye was in the left eye (os).Vitrectomy was not planned, but performed prior to lens implant.Patient's eye anatomy had a dense white cataract, small pupil size and was unable to maintain still during procedure.Per account, trypan blue was use to stain and malyugin ring was placed for better exposure.Kuglen hooks and healon gv was also used.Phaco emulsification was performed.Nucleus was removed using a lens loop.Surgeon had concern regarding posterior capsule post nuclear removal.Machine vitrectomy was then performed.The doctor attempted to place a sulcus lens, but the doctor was unsuccessful due to patient squeezing his eye and moving too many times.Patient was discharged in stable condition and awaiting lens implant, which is expected around august under general anesthesia.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 8/22/2018.Device returned to manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the returned za9003 lens was received in the lens case inside the original packaging box.The lens was observed under microscope.The complaint issue reported as delivery issue was not verified.Although the lens was observed with a haptic damaged, there is no evidence to suggest that the complaint sample has been affected by the manufacturing process.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and no deviation was found during process related to the complaint issue reported.There was no discrepancy found during the mrr (manufacturing record review).The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaint has been received for this production order.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the product.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are (b)(4) and capa-(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|