• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS; MONOFOCAL IOLS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS; MONOFOCAL IOLS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Device Problem Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problem Vitrectomy (2643)
Event Date 06/27/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reportedly, the lens was not implanted; therefore not explanted.Reason for non-evaluation: it was indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device/lot history record, labeling, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the doctor had issues when implanting the lens.A vitrectomy was performed.However, there was no patient injury.Further information was provided and reported the following additional details on the event.This was a complex case.The za9003 lens wasn¿t able to be implanted.Implantation was attempted with the emerald injector and emerald cartridge.There wasn¿t a problem with the lens or cartridge.No additional information was provided to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Sex/gender: male.Based on new information received, patient's affected eye was in the left eye (os).Vitrectomy was not planned, but performed prior to lens implant.Patient's eye anatomy had a dense white cataract, small pupil size and was unable to maintain still during procedure.Per account, trypan blue was use to stain and malyugin ring was placed for better exposure.Kuglen hooks and healon gv was also used.Phaco emulsification was performed.Nucleus was removed using a lens loop.Surgeon had concern regarding posterior capsule post nuclear removal.Machine vitrectomy was then performed.The doctor attempted to place a sulcus lens, but the doctor was unsuccessful due to patient squeezing his eye and moving too many times.Patient was discharged in stable condition and awaiting lens implant, which is expected around august under general anesthesia.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 8/22/2018.Device returned to manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the returned za9003 lens was received in the lens case inside the original packaging box.The lens was observed under microscope.The complaint issue reported as delivery issue was not verified.Although the lens was observed with a haptic damaged, there is no evidence to suggest that the complaint sample has been affected by the manufacturing process.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and no deviation was found during process related to the complaint issue reported.There was no discrepancy found during the mrr (manufacturing record review).The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaint has been received for this production order.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the product.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are (b)(4) and capa-(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS
Type of Device
MONOFOCAL IOLS
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
santa ana CA
MDR Report Key7728913
MDR Text Key115348122
Report Number2648035-2018-01053
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474528970
UDI-Public(01)05050474528970(17)220509
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
P990080
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/09/2022
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/22/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/29/2018
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/30/2018
10/25/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/28/2018
10/30/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EMERALD INJECTOR & CARTRIDGE LOT/SERIAL #''S UNK
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-