• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CASHEL UNKNOWN TRAPEASE VENA CAVA FILTER; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CASHEL UNKNOWN TRAPEASE VENA CAVA FILTER; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 466P306X
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Cardiopulmonary Arrest (1765); Death (1802); Embolus (1830); Occlusion (1984)
Event Date 04/06/2006
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury, damage, to the patient, including, but not limited to migration of the inferior vena cava (ivc) filter, resulting in the death of the patient.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions.The patient suffered fatal injuries, damages and untimely death.As a further proximate result, the patient¿s family member has suffered and will continue to suffer from the wrongful and premature death of the patient.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.An inferior vena cava (ivc) filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without medical records/autopsy report available for review, the reported migration of the ivc filter is unable to be confirmed.Inferior vena cava (ivc) filter migration is a known potential adverse event associated with all ivc filter implants and is listed in the instruction for use (ifu) as such.Possible causes for filter migration includes mega cava, wire entrapment during central venous catheter placement, ¿sail¿ effect (cranial migration) of large clot burden within the filter, mechanical device failure, and operator error.Physiologic causes of migration may result from temporary dysmorphism of the inferior vena cava including bending, coughing or valsalva maneuvers resulting in dislodgment of the filter.Some studies suggest that strenuous physical activity and increased intra-abdominal pressure can lead to migration of ivc filters.The events reported that the patient experienced may be cardiac related and without medical records available the clinical cause is unable to be conclusively determined.The untimely expiration of the patient is unfortunate, however, given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury, damage, to the patient, including, but not limited to migration of the inferior vena cava (ivc) filter, resulting in the death of the patient.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions.The patient suffered fatal injuries, damages and untimely death.As a further proximate result.The patient¿s sister has suffered and will continue to suffer from the wrongful and premature death of her sister.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced migration of the filter to the heart, blood clots, clotting and occlusion of the inferior vena cava.Fracture is indicated on the form; however, the form also states that there is no claim that the filter was fractured.Additional information received per the medical records indicate that the patient had a history of saddle pulmonary embolus, shortness of breath, right ventricular (rv) dysfunction, morbid obesity, hypertension, hematuria, palpitations, chest pain and diabetes.  the filter was deployed via the right femoral vein.There were no significant complications. four days after the index procedure, the patient was found to be in ventricular fibrillation.She coded and was pronounced dead.  the autopsy report states the inferior vena cava filter was found within the right atrium.A portion of the filter was caught within the tricuspid valve.The certificate of death states that the cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest, recurrent pulmonary emboli and migration of inferior vena cava filter.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the patient underwent placement of trapease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.Per the medical records, the patient had a history of saddle pulmonary embolus, shortness of breath, right ventricular (rv) dysfunction, morbid obesity, hypertension, hematuria, palpitations, chest pain and diabetes.The filter was deployed via the right femoral vein.There were no significant complications.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury, damage, to the patient, including, but not limited to migration of the inferior vena cava (ivc) filter, resulting in the death of the patient.Per the patient profile form (ppf), the patient experienced migration of the filter to the heart, blood clots, clotting and occlusion of the inferior vena cava.Fracture is indicated on the form; however, the form also states that there is no claim that the filter was fractured.Four days after the index procedure, the patient was found in ventricular fibrillation.Resuscitation was attempted; however, was unsuccessful and the patient was pronounced dead.The autopsy report states the inferior vena cava filter was found within the right atrium.A portion of the filter was caught within the tricuspid valve.The certificate of death states that the cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest, recurrent pulmonary emboli and migration of inferior vena cava filter.The filter is unavailable for analysis.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Inferior vena cava (ivc) filter migration is a known potential adverse event associated with all ivc filter implants and is listed in the instruction for use (ifu) as such.Possible causes for filter migration include mega cava, wire entrapment during central venous catheter placement, ¿sail¿ effect (cranial migration) of large clot burden within the filter, mechanical device failure, and operator error.Physiologic causes of migration may result from temporary dysmorphism of the inferior vena cava including bending, coughing or valsalva maneuvers resulting in dislodgment of the filter.Some studies suggest that strenuous physical activity and increased intra-abdominal pressure can lead to migration of ivc filters.Blood clots, pulmonary emboli and occlusive thrombosis within the filter and vasculature do not represent a device malfunction.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Without procedural films or images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN TRAPEASE VENA CAVA FILTER
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel, co. tipperary
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel, co. tipperary
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes, FL 33014
7863138372
MDR Report Key7729218
MDR Text Key115339414
Report Number1016427-2018-01697
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/02/2019
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number466P306X
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/03/2018
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/01/2018
01/03/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/27/2018
02/02/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age43 YR
Patient Weight159
-
-