Catalog Number 6052-0830S |
Device Problems
Degraded (1153); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); Injury (2348)
|
Event Date 07/19/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the reported lot.There have been no other similar events for the sterile lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned / not received.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that patient's hip was revised due to impingement.Surgeon also reported suspicion of infection with evidence of poly wear cited as the cause.Intra-operatively, no visual evidence of poly wear was found.Patient was revised to a spacer including a 6 x 127 hfx stem.The trunnion of the stem was impinging with the cup.Sales rep believes that infection was confirmed to prompt implantation of a first stage antibiotic spacer.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that patient's hip was revised due to impingement.Surgeon also reported suspicion of infection with evidence of poly wear cited as the cause.Intra-operatively, no visual evidence of poly wear was found.Patient was revised to a spacer including a 6 x 127 hfx stem.The trunnion of the stem was impinging with the cup.Sales rep believes that infection was confirmed to prompt implantation of a first stage antibiotic spacer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding rom (impingement) and infection was reported.The rom (impingement) was confirmed through photographs provided.The infection was not confirmed method & results: device evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs shows a recently explanted securfit stem.From the photographs provided there is evidence of deep gouging on the neck of the device.Medical records received and evaluation: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot or sterile lot.Conclusion: the exact cause of the event (infection) could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.While the rom (impingement) event was confirmed through photographs provided the root cause could not be determined.Additional information, including operative reports, progress notes, x-rays and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|