|
Catalog Number CRE14S |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/27/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the crosser cto recanalization catheter products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the crosser cto recanalization catheter products are identified, respectively.No medical records and no medical images were provided to the manufacturer.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The return of the device is pending.The investigation is currently under way.(expiration date: 06/2019).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that after 4 minutes and forty six seconds of activation, the distal tip of the recanalization catheter allegedly separated from the catheter.The recanalization catheter was removed without incident.Reportedly, the lesion was successfully crossed and balloon angioplasty was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Investigation summary: two segments of a crosser 14s catheter were returned for evaluation.Based on the visual inspection the investigation is confirmed for tip detachment as well as material twisted due to the twisting on the catheter.The root cause could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural factors contributed to the event.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that after 4 minutes and forty six seconds of activation, the distal tip of the recanalization catheter allegedly separated from the catheter.The recanalization catheter was removed without incident.Reportedly, the lesion was successfully crossed and balloon angioplasty was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|