• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. SECURESTRAP UNKNOWN PRODUCT; IMPLANTABLE STAPLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. SECURESTRAP UNKNOWN PRODUCT; IMPLANTABLE STAPLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problems Purulent Discharge (1812); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Attempts are being made to obtain the additional information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products used in this procedure? citation: langenbeck's archives of surgery.Doi: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00423-018-1676-z.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported in a journal article title: effect of fixation devices on postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial of permanent tacks, absorbable tacks, and synthetic glue.The method of anchoring the mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is claimed to cause postoperative pain, affecting the quality of life (qol) of the patients.The aim of this randomized study was to compare the effect of three types of fixation devices on postoperative pain, patient quality of life, and hernia recurrence.A total of 75 patients with ventral hernias between 2 and 7 cm were randomized into one of three mesh fixation groups: permanent tacks (25 patients; 18 male and 7 female patients; age range: 58.1 ± 11.2; bmi: 29.9 ± 3.8), absorbable tacks (securestrap; 25 patients; 15 male and 10 female patients; age range: 60.2 ± 10.8; bmi: 28.8 ± 4.0), and absorbable synthetic glue (25 patients; 21 male and 4 female patients; age range: 56.7 ± 9.8; bmi: 29.2 ± 3.8) and were included in the study.During the surgical procedure, a physiomesh mesh (ethicon) laminated with resorbable monocryl sutures (ethicon) on both sides were used in all groups.The anchoring devices used were permanent tacks, securestrap absorbable tacks (ethicon), and absorbable synthetic glue.Before introducing the mesh to the abdominal cavity, a sterile template was placed over the mesh.The fixation points were marked according to the double crown technique, ensuring the same number and placement of fixation points in all patients.The mesh was placed bridging the defect and anchored to the abdominal wall with the allocated device.All patients received a 15 cm × 15 cm mesh regardless of the size of the defect, providing an overlap of 4 to 6.5 cm, depending on the size of the fascial defect.At 1 month follow-up in the permanent tacks group, reported complications included infection presenting as redness or discharge of pus at the port site (n-5) in which the infection was self-limiting in 3 patients.Four patients received oral antibiotics; 3 of 4 patients had infections with purulent discharge.The infection progressed in 1 patient who was affected with purulent discharge, and the mesh had to be removed 2 months after surgery, clinically diagnosed seroma (n-9) which resolved spontaneously, mesh sensation reported as bothersome (n-2), and pain (n-3).At 1 month follow-up in the absorbable tacks group, reported complications included infection presenting as redness or discharge of pus at the port site (n-1), clinically diagnosed seroma (n-11) which resolved spontaneously, mesh sensation reported as bothersome (n-3), and pain (n-4).At 1 month follow-up in the absorbable synthetic glue group, reported complications included infection presenting as redness or discharge of pus at the port site (n-1), clinically diagnosed seroma (n-11) which resolved spontaneously, mesh sensation reported as bothersome (n-3), and pain (n-5).At 6 months follow-up in the permanent tacks group, reported complications included recurrence (n-1).At 6 months follow-up in the absorbable tacks group, reported complications included recurrence (n-1).At 12 months follow-up in the permanent tacks group, reported complications included recurrence (n-2).At 12 months follow-up in the absorbable tacks group, reported complications included recurrence (n-1).In conclusion, the present randomized trial in patients undergoing lvhr of small- and medium-sized ventral hernias with a follow-up of 12 months did not show significant differences between permanent tacking, absorbable tacking, and glue fixation of mesh with regard to pain as the primary endpoint or in qol or recurrence rate as secondary endpoints.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pc-(b)(4).Date sent to the fda: (b)(4) 2018.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SECURESTRAP UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE STAPLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-JUAREZ
avenida de las torres 7125
col salvacar
ciudad juarez
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7815652
MDR Text Key118212753
Report Number2210968-2018-75427
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K093845
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/29/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/14/2018
Initial Date FDA Received08/27/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/29/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/29/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-