Results of investigation: a revision surgery with exchange of a plus hi lubricer pe insert and a third party ball head due to pe wear was reported.No part was returned for investigation.The documentation available for the reported pe insert was reviewed.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.No similar complaint was reported for this batch of products.The available medical documents were reviewed.During implantation, a third-party ceramic ball head was implanted.According to the provided revision report, the pe-inlay is worn towards cranial, the capsule is massively thickened and changed gray.The shell and stem are well integrated and left in-vivo.The provided x-rays dated 4 and 6 years after implantation do not show the pe wear.The patient started having pain 7 years after implantation.The patient is described as fairly active with gardening, fitness, cycling and hiking.Based on the available information, the root cause for the pe wear (uhmwpe) cannot be determined.There is however to the best of our knowledge no indication that the device failed to meet specifications at the time of manufacturing.However, it is to be noted that the use of a third-party ball head and the activity of the patient may have contributed to the reported issue.No further actions have been initiated.If the explants or additional information becomes available in the future this investigation will be reopened.
|