The reported ventilator failure could be comprehended by means of the device log file.On the date of the reported event two entries "motor stalled" and "motor slow" were found indicating deviations in the motor's rotation speed.As a safety function the ventilator was stopped accompanied by a corresponding "vent fail" alarm as specified for this situation.Manual ventilation is still possible and the patient status can be derived from the readings of the mandatory patient gas monitoring.The replaced motor of type parvex was received for investigation.The electrical characteristics of the motor (e.G.Rotation starting voltage) were found to be within specification.Also no failure of the incremental encoder (determining the motor position) was identified.The visual inspection of the collector disc has not shown any burn marks explaining a possible contact problem but has shown marks from the carbon brushes which were not even.Maybe this first indication of an emerging problem has caused the reported failure.Finally the replacement of the motor and the incremental encoder has solved the issue and the device was returned to use without further problems reported.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause (parvex motor), is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|