• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1012624-29
Device Problems Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Deformation (2976); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/17/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned to abbott vascular for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other similar incidents reported for the lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.During advancement, the introducer sheath met resistance with the previously implanted stent causing the stent to buckle and/or deform resulting in the implanted stent to move from the deployed position.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a target lesion in the left common iliac artery.The 8.0 x 29 mm omnilink elite stent delivery system was implanted in the left common iliac artery.The stent was well apposed to the vessel wall and everything looked good.The physician decided to advance a sheath through the newly implanted stent, to evaluate the distal vessel for additional lesions/intervention.The sheath had resistance advancing through the stent and caused the stent to buckle and move from its original position.The sheath was removed and a dilatation catheter was advanced.Additional ballooning was able to treat the buckling.As the stent had moved from its original location, an additional 8.0 x 29 mm omnilink elite stent was implanted at the proximal lesion to cover the lesion that was uncovered when the stent moved.The patient was in stable condition post procedure.There were no adverse patient sequelae and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLONMEL, IRELAND REG# 9616693
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7856544
MDR Text Key119565755
Report Number2024168-2018-06962
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIO
UDI-Device Identifier08717648179297
UDI-Public08717648179297
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P110043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2020
Device Catalogue Number1012624-29
Device Lot Number7071041
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/17/2018
Initial Date FDA Received09/07/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-