It was reported that during a benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph) procedure, after 11,071 joules and 0:23:51 minutes of use, fiber break - fiber stopped working were noted.The procedure was complete utilizing a second fiber (another of the same device).The patient's condition following procedure was reported as stable.No injury reported.
|
Product evaluation: failure analysis for fiber (b)(4): the fiber cap exhibits signs of melting which formed a hole from the surface to the bevel edge; the glass cap exhibits devitrification at the output area, and detritus adhesion around output area; the heat shrink tubing exhibits minor scratch marks; the control knob separated into two pieces; the knob portion is attached to the optical fiber; the snap cap portion is attached to white tubing jacket; 1.25 inches of optical fiber is exposed between the knob and snap cap.Probable root cause: based on the device analysis, the probable root cause of the failure is operational context based on heat accumulation.Cap wear was accelerated due to anatomical/procedural factors (tissue contact and technique) encountered during the procedure which would limit the performance of the fiber.Fiber cap condition would result in reduced vaporization efficiency; based on the device analysis, the potential for forward firing may exist.
|