• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Tingling (2171); Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A stinging sensation and there were two blisters already formed/burn me [burns second degree].Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare lower back & hip), from an unspecified date at unknown frequency for pain on left side.The patient medical history was not reported.The patient's concomitant medications were not reported.The patient stated "i've punched the thermacare heatwraps from my local (store name) because i have pain on my left side.I followed the directions on how to apply it.I took it off after six hours because i've felt a stinging sensation and there were two blisters already formed.I've purchased your product to relieve my pain, not to burn me and increase my pain".The action taken in response to the event was unknown.The outcome of the event was unknown.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn blisters" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device., comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn blisters" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] a stinging sensation and there were two blisters already formed/burn me [burns second degree], , narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare lower back & hip), from an unspecified date at unknown frequency for pain on left side.The patient medical history was not reported.The patient's concomitant medications were not reported.The patient stated "i've punched the thermacare heatwraps from my local (store name) because i have pain on my left side.I followed the directions on how to apply it.I took it off after six hours because i've felt a stinging sensation and there were two blisters already formed.I've purchased your product to relieve my pain, not to burn me and increase my pain".The action taken in response to the event was unknown.The outcome of the event was unknown.Product investigation results were as follows: scope: date contacted: (b)(6) 2015 through (b)(6)2018/ manufacturing site: pfizer albany/complaint class: external cause investigation/ complaint sub class: adverse event safety request for investigation.The citi search returned a total 416 complaints for the lower back and hip (lbh) products during this time period for the class/subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.None of the complaints were confirmed to have a manufacturing process root cause for a complaint of adverse event safety request for investigation.The subclass shows a seasonality increase in (b)(6)2016, (b)(6)2016, (b)(6) 2016, (b)(6)2016 through (b)(6)2017, (b)(6)2017 through apr2018.A change in safety's procedure updated on 20aug2018 that has incorporated requesting site investigations for complaints with or without batch number; thus representing a shift in the expected baseline and an overall increase of subsequent complaints received at the site.Eleven of the 19 complaints received in (b)(6) 2017 were related to burns, redness, irritation and blisters.The data shows a spike of 32 complaints received in (b)(6)2017; twenty -one of the 32 were related to burns, rash, blisters, irritation and wrap too hot.Seventeen of the 20 complaint received in (b)(6)2017 were related to burns, redness, blisters, irritation and allergic reaction.Based on this citi search, there is not a trend identified for the subclass of adverse event safety request for investigation.There is no further action required.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Reasonably suggest device malfunction: no.A return sample has not been received at the site for evaluation as of (b)(6)2020.Follow-up (29mar2019): follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (27may2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group includes: product investigation results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected., comment: based on the information provided, the event of "burn blisters" as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Scope: date contacted: 09sep2015 through 09sep2018/ manufacturing site: pfizer albany/complaint class: external cause investigation/ complaint sub class: adverse event safety request for investigation.The citi search returned a total 416 complaints for the lower back and hip (lbh) products during this time period for the class/subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.None of the complaints were confirmed to have a manufacturing process root cause for a complaint of adverse event safety request for investigation.The subclass shows a seasonality increase in (b)(6) 2016, (b)(6)2016, (b)(6)2016 , (b)(6)2016 through (b)(6)2017, (b)(6)2017 through (b)(6)2018.A change in safety¿s procedure updated on (b)(6)2018 that has incorporated requesting site investigations for complaints with or without batch number; thus representing a shift in the expected baseline and an overall increase of subsequent complaints received at the site.Eleven of the 19 complaints received in(b)(6) 2017 were related to burns, redness, irritation and blisters.The data shows a spike of 32 complaints received in (b)(6) 2017; twenty -one of the 32 were related to burns, rash, blisters, irritation and wrap too hot.Seventeen of the 20 complaint received in (b)(6)2017 were related to burns, redness, blisters, irritation and allergic reaction.Based on this citi search, there is not a trend identified for the subclass of adverse event safety request for investigation.There is no further action required.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Reasonably suggest device malfunction: no.A return sample has not been received at the site for evaluation as of (b)(6)2020.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key7870459
MDR Text Key120099328
Report Number1066015-2018-00105
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received09/12/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/01/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-