It was reported that during a benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical procedure at 166,367 joules and 23:47 minutes of use; fiber tip damage and break were observed.The fiber tip was not cleaned during the procedure.The procedure was completed using second fiber at 185,708 joules and 28:06 minutes of use.Patient was reported to be "ok", no injury to patient was reported.
|
Product evaluation: failure analysis for fiber (b)(4): the glass cap shows a circumferential fracture on the distal side of fiber/cap fusion zone at the bevel edge; the fiber proximal to fracture can rotate independently of outer flow tubing; the fiber is broken within the outer flow tubing at open end; the fiber was tested with hene laser fixture, aim beam was visible at fiber break; the glass cap exhibits severe devitrification at output window; the metal cap exhibits severe charred detritus adhesion on surface; the outer flow tubing open end exhibits minor scratch marks and tear.Based on device analysis, the potential for forward firing may exist.Probable root cause: based on the device analysis, the probable root cause of the failure is: operational context based on heat accumulation.Cap wear was accelerated due to anatomical/procedural factors (tissue contact and technique) encountered during the procedure which would limit the performance of the fiber.The identified issues noted above may activate the fiberlife function which would modulate the power showing a pulsing beam or system would be placed into standby mode.
|