• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. OES URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. OES URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-P5
Device Problem Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 09/13/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The urf-p5 device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The cause of the reported complaint cannot be confirmed.To mitigate against patient injury during use, the device instruction manual contains several warning statements regarding device operation: ¿never perform angulation control forcibly or abruptly.¿ ¿never perform angulation control or insertion/withdrawal of the endoscope¿s insertion tube without viewing the endoscopic image.¿ ¿never insert or withdraw the insertion tube abruptly or with excessive force.¿ and ¿never insert or withdraw the endoscope while the endo-therapy accessory extends from the distal end of the endoscope.¿ the instruction manual also has directions for pre-procedure inspection and operational verification of the movement of the scope device.As a preventive measure in the event of device malfunction, the instruction manual also recommends ¿be sure to prepare another endoscope to avoid that the examination will be interrupted due to equipment failure or malfunction.¿.
 
Event Description
One of 2.Olympus was informed that during a diagnostic ureteroscopy, the surgeon was having trouble accessing the left distal ureter using the urf-p5 device.The device was removed from the patient and a separate long rigid ureteroscope was substituted.While using the replacement ureteroscope, the surgeon noticed that the ureter had detached from the kidney.Afterwards the patient was informed that a separate laparoscopic intervention is indicated to repair the avulsed ureter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the physical evaluation results.A visual inspection on the received condition of the scope found multiple buckles and dents on the insertion tube, which likely caused the downward angulations on the scope to be slightly above the standard.The upward angulations were found to be within the standard.In addition, the device failed the leak test due to missing bending section cover glue at the distal end.Additionally, the bending section cover glue on the insertion tube side was cracked and lifted.Based on the evaluation results, the scope damages are indicative of improper scope handling.A review of the instrument history showed, the scope was purchased on march 26, 2018 and was last repaired on may 7, 2018.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to make a correction on the procode from fbn to fgb.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The oem performed further investigation based on the reported information.A dhr review was conducted for the subject scope and found no anomalies during the manufacturing process.Based on olympus¿s investigation, the exact cause of the reported event cannot be confirmed, however, the investigation concludes that the subject scope causing or contributing to the reported event is determined to be remote as the subject scope was reportedly removed from the patient without any reported problems.To mitigate the risk of patient safety, the instruction manual (chapter 3 preparation and inspection) provides warning which states, ¿before each case, prepare and inspect this instrument as instructed below.Inspect other equipment to be used with this instrument as instructed in their respective instruction manuals.If any irregularities are suspected after inspection, follow the instructions given in chapter 10, ¿troubleshooting¿.If this instrument malfunctions, do not use it.Return it to olympus for repair as described in section 10.3.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OES URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to
MDR Report Key7896397
MDR Text Key120964716
Report Number2951238-2018-00556
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340307
UDI-Public04953170340307
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K912120
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/03/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-P5
Device Catalogue NumberURF-P5
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/14/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/18/2018
Initial Date FDA Received09/20/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/20/2018
01/28/2019
02/13/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/29/2018
02/19/2019
03/03/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
OLYMPUS MR-6LA SCOPE
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-